Self-as-an-End
Self-as-an-End Theory Series · The Human: A Relationship of Self with Self · Paper III · Zenodo 19059139

To Forget the Self

From Self-Understanding to Structural Respect for the Other
Han Qin (秦汉)  ·  Independent Researcher  ·  March 2026
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19059139  ·  CC BY 4.0  ·  ORCID: 0009-0009-9583-0018
Zenodo Record

"To study the self is to forget the self." — Dōgen, Genjōkōan

Paper One answered "what am I looking at?" Paper Two answered "what is each layer doing, how does it break, how is it misjudged?" This paper answers: "once I have seen clearly, why must I extend the same acknowledgment to the other?" — and shows why this "why" is not a preset purpose but the direction that naturally emerges after completing the first two steps.

Abstract

The first paper in this series ("To Study the Self") established the structure of introspection — the emergent layer inspecting the working interval with the foundation layer as its boundary. The second paper ("To Understand the Self") illuminated what each layer does, how it breaks, and how it is misjudged, revealing two colonization systems and their handoff mechanism. Both papers are 13DD's work: looking inward. This paper addresses what comes after 13DD's work is complete: acknowledging outward.

This paper argues that the endpoint of introspection is not self-understanding (14DD) but the extension of that understanding into structural acknowledgment and nurturance of the other's DD sequence (15DD). 14DD (self-image management) is the farthest point that observation and illumination can reach, and also the most refined form of colonization (fixation of fixation). 15DD is the leap from "my DD sequence is the center" to "the other's DD sequence is equally real." "Forgetting the self" does not mean forgetting one's existence but relinquishing one's special status as the sole end — not annihilation, but decentering.

The paper further reveals a third colonization system (meaning-colonization — the emergent layer using why to colonize the Stabilization round's direction), translates "do not do to others what you do not wish done to yourself" into eight layer-specific operational directives within the DD framework, distinguishes three erroneous forms of "forgetting" (Zhuangzi-style shutdown, moralistic suppression, nihilistic denial), engages in dialogue with Confucius, Kant, Levinas, Buddhism, Dōgen, and Jung, and advances four non-trivial predictions with falsification conditions.

This paper presents an ethical-operational framework, not a moral code. 15DD's non dubito (not doubting that the other also has remainder) is not a moral command but the direction that naturally emerges after completing observation and illumination — what Kant's Third Critique calls "purposiveness without purpose."

Keywords: Forget the Self, non dubito, 15DD, Self-as-an-End, colonization, nurturance, meaning-colonization, ethical turn, purposiveness without purpose

Series Positioning

Dōgen's Genjōkōan contains four sentences:

  1. "To study the Buddha Way is to study the self." → Paper I: 观己 / To Study the Self (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18897147)
  2. "To study the self is to forget the self." → Split into two steps:
    • Paper II: 照己 / To Understand the Self (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18934125)
    • Paper III: 破己 / To Forget the Self — this paper
  3. "To forget the self is to be actualized by myriad things." → Subsequent work

The English series follows Dōgen's path: Study → Understand → Forget. The Chinese series follows the Buddhist path: 观 (observe) → 照 (illuminate) → 破 (break through). Three papers correspond to DD sequence's three-layer functional division:

  • Papers I + II: address the Stabilization round (5DD–8DD) and Development round (9DD–12DD) — introspection's structure and content
  • Paper III: addresses the Fixation round (13DD+, why) — introspection's meaning and direction
Paper I answers "what am I looking at?" Paper II answers "what is each layer doing, how does it break, how is it misjudged?" Paper III answers "once I have seen clearly, why must I extend the same acknowledgment to the other?" This "why" is not a preset purpose but the direction that naturally emerges after completing the first two steps — purposiveness without purpose.

I. The Problem: Why Understanding Is Not Enough

1.1 The Structural Limitation of 13DD

Papers I and II are both 13DD's work: observing, distinguishing, naming, locating. However precise 13DD becomes, it has one ineliminable limitation — it departs from "I." The Eight Pains and Eight Graces are "my" Eight Pains and Eight Graces. The drive of introspection is "I want to figure myself out."

This means the entire output of the first two papers still serves the self. You have seen your eight-layer structure clearly, you understand each layer's pain and grace, you have identified three colonization systems operating on you — then what? If you stop here, you have acquired a more refined self-understanding, and that understanding itself becomes raw material for 14DD (self-image management): "I am a person who has done deep introspection."

1.2 The Trap of Psychoanalysis

The fundamental predicament of the psychoanalytic tradition lies here. Freud analyzed the unconscious, Jung integrated the shadow, Patañjali practiced layer-by-layer contemplation — all these efforts point in a single direction: better understanding of "I." Jung's individuation comes closest: after integrating the shadow, you become a more complete "I." But "I" is still the center. Individuation stops at 14DD — a richer, more integrated, more coherent self-narrative.

Zhuangzi saw this problem ("I lost my self"), but his solution was to shut down the observer — Paper I already analyzed the self-contradiction of this operation. You cannot use 9DD to select "not selecting."

The question is not how to shut down 13DD, but what comes after 13DD's work is complete.

1.3 This Paper's Task

This paper argues: after 13DD has completed its understanding of its own DD sequence, the structural next step is not deeper self-understanding (that is running in circles) but the extension of the same acknowledgment — each layer has a function, a pain, a grace, and ineliminable remainder — to the other's DD sequence. This extension is 15DD. This extension is the precise definition of "forgetting the self." The operational imperative of this extension is "do not do to others what you do not wish done to yourself."

II. 14DD: Self-Image Management — The Most Refined Colonization

2.1 The Function of 14DD

14DD manages "what kind of person I am." It weaves 13DD's observations, 12DD's logical reasoning, 11DD's memories, 8DD's expressions — signals from all layers — into a coherent self-narrative. "I am a courageous person," "I am a deep person," "I am a person who has understood himself" — these are all products of 14DD.

14DD is not bad. It is a normal part of the DD sequence's development. Without 14DD, 13DD's observations cannot be integrated into an operable identity. The positive form of 14DD is an honest, examined, remainder-acknowledging self-narrative — you know who you are, and you know that this "knowing" has blind spots.

2.2 14DD's Colonizing Form: Fixation of Fixation

The danger of 14DD is this: it is the fixation of the fixation process itself. 13DD is already fixation — it fixes 5DD–12DD signals into observable states. 14DD is fixation of fixation — it further fixes 13DD's results into an identity narrative and then maintains that narrative.

When 14DD overworks, it becomes the most refined form of colonization. Not suppressing a particular layer's signals (that is 13DD's colonization), but incorporating all layers' signals into a narrative it needs. If your 5DD fear does not fit "I am a courageous person," 14DD recodes it as "caution" rather than acknowledging it as fear. Introspection can be completely co-opted at 14DD: "I did introspection, I understood my Eight Pains and Eight Graces, I am a person with self-awareness" — this entire understanding becomes raw material for 14DD's self-narrative. Understanding becomes a more sophisticated narcissism.

2.3 14DD Is the Ceiling of Observation and Illumination

A clarification: 14DD is not the problem; 14DD's self-closure is the problem. 14DD does not need to be skipped; it needs to be de-privileged. Healthy 14DD — an honest, examined, remainder-acknowledging self-narrative — is a necessary prerequisite for 15DD (see Prediction 4). Without the healthy completion of 14DD, attempting to leap directly to 15DD produces only moralistic forgetting or nihilistic forgetting (see Section V). The danger of 14DD is not that it exists, but that it claims to be the destination.

The farthest point that Papers I + II can reach is 14DD. Breaking through 14DD is not deeper introspection — deeper introspection still circles within 14DD. Having 14DD de-center itself is like asking a hammer to nail itself in. Breaking through 14DD requires a change of direction: from looking inward to acknowledging outward.

2.4 Meaning-Colonization: The Third Colonization System

Paper II revealed two colonization systems: medical colonization manages negative blockage (in a white coat); social-normative colonization manages positive overload (in a moral uniform). This paper reveals the third: meaning-colonization — the emergent layer using why to colonize the Stabilization round's direction (in the uniform of purpose).

The operational structure of meaning-colonization: 13DD+ first installs a why (mission, vision, purpose), then uses that why to suppress 5DD–8DD signals. Your 5DD is afraid; why says "fear is the price of growth." Your 6DD is trapped; why says "suffering is meaningful." Your 8DD is blocked; why says "endure it for the greater goal."

The complete map of three colonization systems:

First system, medical colonization: 13DD+ pathologizing negative blockage across 5DD–12DD — colonization in a white coat.

Second system, social-normative colonization: 13DD+ labeling positive overload across 5DD–12DD as deviance — colonization in a moral uniform.

Third system, meaning-colonization: 13DD+ using why to negate the Stabilization round's (5DD–8DD) direction — colonization in the uniform of purpose.

Meaning-colonization is the most covert of the three, because it wears the best-looking uniform. You might resist medical colonization. You might reject social-normative colonization. But you actively embrace meaning-colonization — "I have a sense of mission," "I've found my purpose." You believe this why is yours, but it may have been externally installed, and your Stabilization round (5DD–8DD) is being suppressed by it.

The criterion for distinguishing meaning-colonization from meaning-nurturance is the whether → how → why sequence: if why grows naturally after the Stabilization round and acknowledges the Stabilization round's priority, it is nurturance. If why is installed before the Stabilization round and used to negate the Stabilization round's signals, it is colonization. The same why, different sequence — colonization and nurturance flip.

Supplementary criteria for adjudicating the gray zone: whether the why is revocable (can the subject abandon it at any time without penalty), whether foundation-layer signals are permitted to override it, and whether compliance is demanded before perception. An external why that satisfies all three criteria is scaffolding, not colonization; violating any one enters the colonization zone.

III. 15DD: Treating the Other as End — The Structural Definition of Forgetting the Self

3.1 The 15DD Leap

15DD is the leap from "my DD sequence is the center" to "the other's DD sequence is equally real, equally irreducible, equally an end."

This leap is not a moral command. "You should care about others" is 13DD's social censorship issuing orders — it can be obeyed or defied, but either way it is externally imposed. 15DD is not a command but an acknowledgment: the other also has 5DD–12DD, the other's Eight Pains and Eight Graces are as real as yours, the other's remainder is as ineliminable as yours.

This acknowledgment constitutes "forgetting the self" because it cancels one's special status. Within the 13DD–14DD framework, "I" am the only entity whose DD sequence has been experienced from the inside. The 15DD leap: you do not need to have experienced the other's DD sequence from inside to acknowledge its reality. You have already seen clearly on your own DD sequence what the structure is; you know this structure is not unique to you. Not doubting that the other also has the same structure, also has remainder — that is enough.

3.2 Non Dubito: The Operational Attitude of 15DD

9DD non dubito vs. 15DD non dubito

9DD non dubito: you act in the world without self-undermining. You choose, and you do not reverse. This is the subject's relationship with the world.

15DD non dubito: you acknowledge the other's DD sequence as equally real as yours, without requiring evidence, without requiring verification, without requiring the other to first "prove" they deserve to be treated as an end. This is the subject's relationship with the other.

9DD non dubito resolves "can I act stably in the world?" 15DD non dubito resolves "can I acknowledge the other as equally real?" Without 9DD non dubito, you cannot stand in the world. Without 15DD non dubito, you stand but you stand alone.

And 9DD is a prerequisite for 15DD: only when you are non dubito toward the world (9DD is stable) can you be non dubito toward the other (15DD).

Non dubito is not "believing" (a 12DD construct, falsifiable), not "ought to believe" (13DD moral censorship), not "feeling" (10DD perception). Non dubito is: structurally acknowledging the completeness of the other's DD sequence and the reality of the other's remainder, just as you acknowledge your own.

A guardrail is needed: the object of non dubito is "the other also has a DD sequence equally real and irreducible as mine," not "everything the other says should be accepted." 15DD does not cancel judgment; what it cancels is the prior operation of reducing the other to my model, my tool, or an object awaiting my verification. Non dubito is 15DD's operational attitude, just as humor is 13DD's positive form.

3.3 The Precise Definition of "Forgetting"

Forget the self means: forgetting one's special status as the only entity acknowledged to have remainder. When you extend the acknowledgment of "having remainder" from yourself to all others, "the self" is no longer the center — not annihilated, but no longer special. Not oblivion, but decentering.

Forget the self does not mean forgetting one's existence (that is the Zhuangzi-style self-contradiction), does not mean suppressing one's needs (that is 13DD's colonization command disguised as selflessness), does not mean believing one is unimportant (that is 7DD Anger disguised as philosophy).

IV. Do Not Do to Others What You Do Not Wish Done to Yourself: The Operational Imperative of 15DD

4.1 Structural Rereading

The prerequisite for "what you do not wish" is that you have first completed observation and illumination. You must first know what you do not wish — not the vague "I don't want to be hurt," but precise to each layer. "Do not do to others" is the operational definition of 15DD: do not do to the other's DD sequence what you have already recognized as colonization. Not because an external rule forbids it, but because you know from inside your own DD sequence that it is colonization.

4.2 Eight-Layer Unfolding of "What You Do Not Wish"

DDWhat I do not wishDo not do to others
5DDI do not wish my fear to be deniedDo not deny the other's fear
6DDI do not wish to be trappedDo not trap the other
7DDI do not wish my new directions to be blockedDo not block the other's new directions
8DDI do not wish my expression to be censoredDo not censor the other's expression
9DDI do not wish my selection function to be destabilizedDo not destabilize the other's selection function
10DDI do not wish my pain to be ignoredDo not ignore the other's pain
11DDI do not wish my memories to be negatedDo not negate the other's memories
12DDI do not wish my understanding to be steamrolledDo not steamroll the other's understanding

This table is the DD-layer specification of "do not do to others what you do not wish done to yourself." Each row is a concrete operational directive, not an abstract moral principle.

4.3 From Colonization Diagnosis to Ethical Operation

Paper II established the analytical framework of colonization systems. This paper extends the same framework from "system upon individual" and "emergent layer upon foundation layer" to "individual upon individual." You tell your child "you shouldn't be afraid" — you are colonizing their 5DD. You tell your partner "you're overthinking" — you are colonizing their 12DD. You tell your friend "you should cheer up" — you are colonizing their 8DD. You tell your student "you should aim higher" — you are performing meaning-colonization on them (negating their Stabilization round's direction with your why). All these operations can be precisely located within the DD framework.

4.4 Nurturance as the Positive Operation of 15DD

The opposite of colonization is not neglect (neglect is 13DD withdrawal, analyzed in Paper II), but nurturance. The positive operation of 15DD is nurturance of the other's DD sequence: not censoring the other's signals, creating conditions for the other's Eight Graces.

Structural definition of nurturance: creating conditions for the other's DD sequence to operate without colonization. You do not need to solve the other's 5DD fear for them; you need to not deny their fear, letting it transform naturally into courage in an environment free from censorship. You do not need to provide why for the other; you need to let their Stabilization round decide first, their Development round unfold next, and why grow naturally.

Nurturance includes both a negative obligation (I do not colonize you) and a positive obligation (when a third party colonizes you, I do not stay silent). Standing by when the other's remainder is being suppressed is not 15DD — non dubito must respond: removing the colonization source, blocking the colonization channel, providing the other with an exit. When non dubito stops running, it is no longer 15DD.

V. Three Erroneous Forms of "Forgetting"

5.1 Zhuangzi-Style Forgetting: Shutting Down the Observer

Analyzed in Paper I. Using 9DD to select "not selecting" — self-contradictory. The structural problem of "sitting and forgetting" is that 13DD cannot shut itself down through its own operations. The most you can achieve is 13DD pretending to withdraw — but pretending to withdraw is precisely one of 14DD's advanced self-narratives ("I am a person who has transcended the self"). Shutting down the observer is not breaking through; it is another, more covert form of fixation.

5.2 Moralistic Forgetting: Suppressing the Self

"Selfless devotion," "self-sacrifice," "putting others first" — these are 13DD's censorship commands, not 15DD's structural turn. Suppressing one's own DD sequence to serve the other is the emergent layer colonizing the foundation layer — except the target of colonization has shifted from the other to the self.

The structural error: it still presupposes a zero-sum relationship between self and other. 15DD does not move the center from self to other (that merely reverses the direction of colonization); it cancels the "center" itself. Not "I don't matter, you matter," but "every DD sequence matters equally, including mine."

5.3 Nihilistic Forgetting: Nothing Matters

"Everything is empty," "nothing is worth caring about" — this is not 15DD's transcendence but 7DD Anger (differentiation has stopped, no new directions are growing) disguised as a philosophical stance. Nihilism is subtraction; 15DD is multiplication — not reducing everything to zero, but multiplying the acknowledgment of one's own DD sequence by the number of others.

VI. Theoretical Positioning

6.1 Confucius

"Do not do to others what you do not wish done to yourself" is the most precise traditional formulation of 15DD's operational imperative. Confucius's contribution: anchoring ethics in "what you do not wish" — starting from one's own experience, then extending to the other. This sequence perfectly matches the three papers' sequence.

What Confucius lacked is DD-layer precision. "What you do not wish" is general, without layer-by-layer specification. This paper provides that specification: eight layers of "what you do not wish" correspond to eight layers of "do not do to others." "Ren" (仁, humaneness) in the DD framework: 15DD's positive form — structural nurturance of the other's DD sequence. Not feeling, not principle, but a sustained operational attitude — non dubito that the other also has remainder.

6.2 Kant

The three Critiques in the DD framework: First Critique (Critique of Pure Reason) is 12DD's work. Second Critique (Critique of Practical Reason) is 13DD's work — the moral imperative, "you ought." The Second Critique's formula ("always treat persons as ends and never merely as means") is the classic philosophical formulation of 15DD. The name Self-as-an-End derives from this. But Kant's pathway is a priori rational derivation (12DD–13DD) that does not pass through introspection.

SAE's pathway: you first experience on your own DD sequence what it feels like to be treated as a means (colonization), understand that feeling's eight-layer structure, and then know from inside that "I should not do the same to the other." Kant's imperative is a leap from 12DD–13DD to 15DD; SAE's imperative is a natural arrival at 15DD after sequentially passing through 5DD–14DD.

But Kant himself, in the Third Critique, inadvertently provided the precise formula for how 15DD is reached: purposiveness without purpose (Zweckmäßigkeit ohne Zweck). 15DD is not a preset purpose ("I will become a person who treats others as ends" — that is 14DD's self-narrative) but the direction that naturally emerges once you have walked through the Stabilization round (whether/what) and the Development round (how). "You ought to treat others as ends" is the Second Critique's colonization command. True 15DD is the Third Critique's structure — purposiveness without purpose.

6.3 Levinas

The face of the other (le visage d'autrui) as an irreducible presence constitutes the starting point of ethics. Levinas saw the core of 15DD: the other is not your construct; the other possesses ineliminable remainder.

What Levinas lacked is the inward pathway. He departs from the other, but does not explain how the subject arrives at the position from which it can "see the other's face." SAE's supplement: you must first complete the observation and illumination of your own DD sequence before you can see the same structure in the other. A person without introspection sees the other's face but encodes it through 13DD–14DD into their own narrative — "they are pitiable" (13DD's judgment), "they are like me" (14DD's assimilation) — neither of them is 15DD's non dubito. 15DD is acknowledging that behind the other's face lies a complete DD sequence whose content you do not know (external non-measurability — Paper I's core finding), but whose existence you do not doubt.

6.4 Buddhist Compassion

Compassion (karuṇā) in the DD framework is not an emotion but the structural acknowledgment that the other's suffering is isomorphic with yours. "Great compassion without conditions, great mercy from shared body" precisely corresponds to 15DD's structure: "without conditions" — no need to first establish a 12DD relational construct before extending nurturance; "shared body" — the other's DD sequence is isomorphic with yours.

Buddhism's path (know suffering → know the cause → know the cessation → walk the path) is isomorphic with this series' three papers: observe → illuminate → break through. Paper II's analysis revealed: Buddhism removed doubt and shock from its theory of suffering and placed them in its methodology (doubt is the tool for breaking through, shock is the gateway to awakening). Awakening is arriving at 15DD — non dubito that the other also has remainder. This is also why Zen says awakening "cannot be spoken" — 12DD content can always be spoken (it is a model), but 15DD cannot (it is not a new model; it is the non dubito attitude toward all models).

6.5 Completing Dōgen

"To study the Buddha Way is to study the self" — observe: initiate introspection of one's own DD sequence.

"To study the self is to forget the self" — split into illuminate + break through: first understand one's own DD sequence's Eight Pains and Eight Graces and colonization structure (illuminate), then extend the same acknowledgment to the other (break through).

"To forget the self is to be actualized by myriad things" — myriad things are not an abstract universe; they are the concrete DD sequences of others. To be actualized by the other means that your 15DD is confirmed in the real encounter with the other's DD sequence. You are non dubito that the other has remainder; the other, operating normally within your non-colonization, confirms that your 15DD is not empty speculation. This is actualization, not verification.

15DD answers the question "why?" with silence — not the emptiness of nihilism (7DD), but a structural yielding: my why-position is vacated so that the other's why has space to exist. Not having a why is itself the most complete form of purposiveness without purpose.

6.6 Jung's Ceiling

Jung's individuation reaches 14DD and stops. Integrating the shadow, accepting the anima/animus, approaching the Self — all of it is the integration of "I." Jung's Self is not 15DD's treating-the-other-as-end; it is a more complete self-narrative at 14DD.

Jung saw the inner other (shadow, anima as "others" within the psyche) but did not reach the outer other. The leap from Jung to 15DD: not only integrating one's own inner remainder, but acknowledging the other's remainder. The shadow also exists within the other's DD sequence — and the other's shadow is not your material. It is the other's own, possessing a reality equal to yours.

VII. Non-Trivial Predictions

Prerequisite note: The following predictions are conditional on the establishment of assessment instruments. 15DD as an ethical-level operation is more difficult to measure than 5DD–12DD affective states — 14DD can mimic 15DD, so self-report indicators must be cross-validated with behavioral indicators and relational feedback indicators. These predictions are structural research hypotheses and do not constitute ethical guidance or psychological intervention advice.

Prediction 1

The establishment of 15DD will reduce the emergent layer's maintenance burden. Specifically: 14DD's self-narrative maintenance is a high-energy operation; when 15DD extends the "sole end" status from self to others, 14DD's maintenance pressure is relieved, and the resources freed will produce measurable improvement in the working interval (5DD–12DD) function.

Falsification condition: If the stable establishment of 15DD operation shows no significant correlation with 5DD–12DD functional improvement, this prediction is falsified.

Prediction 2

15DD's interpersonal nurturance operation will improve the other's DD-layer function. Specifically: in a relational environment that does not colonize the other's DD sequence, the other's Eight Graces (Courage, Safety, Joy, Flow, Non dubito, Tranquility, Sweetness, Laughter) will show measurable improvement, and the order of improvement will follow the Eight Graces' sequential support structure (lower layers improve first, higher layers later).

Falsification condition: If non-colonizing relational environments show no significant correlation with improvement in the other's Eight Graces, or if the order of improvement is inconsistent with the sequential support structure, this prediction is falsified.

Prediction 3

The DD-layer specification of "do not do to others what you do not wish done to yourself" will improve interpersonal conflict resolution efficiency. Specifically: when both parties in a conflict can identify which DD layer each is colonizing in the other, conflict resolution speed and mutual satisfaction will be significantly higher than in conflict resolution without DD-layer identification.

Falsification condition: If DD-layer colonization identification shows no significant difference in conflict resolution effectiveness compared to traditional approaches, this prediction is falsified.

Prediction 4

The stable establishment of 15DD requires the healthy completion of 14DD as a prerequisite. Specifically: individuals who attempt to skip 14DD and reach 15DD directly will exhibit moralistic forgetting (self-suppression) or nihilistic forgetting (nothing matters), rather than genuine 15DD. Only individuals who have completed 14DD in a healthy manner can stably operate at 15DD.

Falsification condition: If the degree of 14DD completion shows no significant positive correlation with 15DD stability, this prediction is falsified.

VIII. Conclusion

8.1 Recovery

This paper argues that the endpoint of introspection is not self-understanding (14DD) but the extension of self-understanding into structural acknowledgment and nurturance of the other's DD sequence (15DD). "Forgetting the self" is not oblivion but the cancellation of one's special status as the sole end. "Do not do to others what you do not wish done to yourself" is 15DD's operational imperative: you have experienced colonization's eight-layer structure from inside your own DD sequence; you do not do the same to the other. This imperative is not a moral command but purposiveness without purpose — the position naturally arrived at after completing observation and illumination.

8.2 Contributions

  1. Defines 14DD (self-image management) as introspection's ceiling — the farthest point observation and illumination can reach, and also the most refined form of colonization (fixation of fixation).
  2. Reveals meaning-colonization as the third colonization system — the emergent layer using why to colonize the Stabilization round's direction, wearing the uniform of purpose, the most covert of the three systems.
  3. Defines 15DD as the structural leap of treating the other as end. Provides the precise definition of "forgetting the self": not oblivion, but decentering.
  4. Specifies "do not do to others what you do not wish done to yourself" layer by layer as eight concrete operational directives.
  5. Distinguishes three erroneous forms of "forgetting" from 15DD's positive form (non dubito that the other also has remainder).
  6. Completes the DD-framework reading of Dōgen's four sentences.

8.3 Open Questions

First, the relationship between 15DD and 16DD — 15DD is still unidirectional. The candidate form of 16DD is mutual non dubito — both parties simultaneously non dubito that the other has remainder. Buddhist dharmakāya points in this direction. 4DD is introspection's lower-boundary thing-in-itself (Paper I); 16DD is introspection's upper-boundary thing-in-itself. The full operable interval for human beings is 4DD–15DD.

Second, the operationalization of 15DD measurement — behavioral observation (whether the person nurtures rather than colonizes when the other's DD sequence is under pressure) and relational feedback (whether the other's Eight Graces improve in the relationship) may be needed for cross-validation.

Third, the relationship between 15DD and institutional design — can 15DD be embedded in institutional design? What does a "non-colonizing" institution look like? How does it provide direction without performing meaning-colonization?

Fourth, the structure of "being actualized by myriad things" — actualization is simultaneous: you are doing (non dubito), and the doing itself is the actualization. Not "if you forget the self, then you will be actualized" (that is a 12DD causal construct), but "forgetting the self is being actualized" — two faces of the same event. The further unfolding of this simultaneity structure belongs to subsequent work.

8.4 Completing the Series: From Observation to Breaking Through

观 → 照 → 破. Whether → how → why. See → understand → let go. What is let go is not one's existence, but one's status as the sole end.

Paper I (观己 / To Study the Self) establishes introspection's structure — what you are looking at, who the observer is, where the boundaries lie.

Paper II (照己 / To Understand the Self) establishes introspection's content — what each layer does, how it breaks, how it is misjudged by three colonization systems.

Paper III (破己 / To Forget the Self) establishes introspection's endpoint — having seen clearly, extending the same acknowledgment to the other, canceling one's special status, arriving at structural respect for the other's DD sequence from self-understanding.

Key References

This paper is part of the applied paper series for the Self-as-an-End theoretical framework. For the foundational framework, see: Qin, H. (2025). "The Complete Self-as-an-End Framework" (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18727327). For Paper I of this series, see: Qin, H. (2025). "To Study the Self" (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18897147). For Paper II, see: Qin, H. (2025). "To Understand the Self" (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18934125).

The Human: A Relationship of Self with Self  ·  ← Paper I: To Study the Self   |   Paper II: To Understand the Self   |   Paper III: To Forget the Self

"自己をならふといふは、自己をわするるなり。" — 道元《现成公案》

第一篇回答"我在看什么",第二篇回答"每一层在做什么、怎么坏、怎么被误判"。本文回答:看清了以后,为什么必须把同样的承认延伸到他者——以及为什么这个"为什么"不是被设定的目的,而是走完前两步之后自然呈现的方向。

摘要

本系列第一篇("观己")建立了内观的结构——涌现层以基础层为边界对工作区间进行内检。第二篇("照己")照清了工作区间每一层的痛与正、两套殖民系统及其交接机制。两篇论文都是13DD的工作:向内看。本文处理13DD工作完成之后的下一步:向外承认。

本文论证:内观的终点不是自我理解(14DD),而是从自我理解中推出对他者DD序列的结构性承认与涵育(15DD)。14DD(自我形象管理)是观与照能到达的最远处,也是最精致的殖民形式(固的固)。15DD是从"我的DD序列是中心"到"他者的DD序列与我的同等真实"的跃迁。"忘我"不是遗忘自己的存在,而是取消自己作为唯一目的的特殊地位——不是被消灭,而是去中心化。

本文进一步揭示第三套殖民系统(意义殖民——涌现层用why对定轮次方向的殖民),将"己所不欲勿施于人"在DD框架下逐层精确化为八条操作指令,区分"忘"的三种错误形态(庄子式关机、道德式压制、虚无式否认),与孔子、康德、列维纳斯、佛教、道元、荣格建立对话,并提出四条附有否证条件的非平凡预测。

本文提出的是一个伦理操作框架,不是道德规范学。15DD的non dubito(不疑他者也有余项)不是道德命令,而是走完观与照之后自然呈现的方向——康德第三批判所谓"非目的性的合目的性"。

关键词:破己,non dubito,15DD,己所不欲勿施于人,Self-as-an-End,殖民,涵育,意义殖民,伦理转向

系列定位

道元《现成公案》四句:

  1. "参究佛道就是参究自己。" → 第一篇:观己 / To Study the Self(DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18897147
  2. "参究自己就是忘掉自己。" → 拆为两步:
    • 第二篇:照己 / To Understand the Self(DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18934125
    • 第三篇:破己 / To Forget the Self——本文
  3. "忘掉自己就是被万法所证成。" → 后续

英文系列沿道元的思路:Study → Understand → Forget。中文系列沿佛教的思路:观 → 照 → 破。三篇对应DD序列的三层功能分工:

  • 第一篇 + 第二篇:处理定轮次(5DD-8DD)和展轮次(9DD-12DD)——内观的结构与内容
  • 第三篇:处理固轮次(13DD+,why)——内观的意义与方向
观己回答"我在看什么",照己回答"每一层在做什么、怎么坏、怎么被误判",破己回答"看清了以后为什么必须把同样的承认延伸到他者"。这个"为什么"不是被设定的目的,而是走完前两步之后自然呈现的方向——非目的性的合目的性。

一、问题的提出:为什么理解不够

1.1 13DD的结构性限制

第一篇和第二篇都是13DD的工作:观察、区分、命名、定位。13DD再精确也有一个不可消除的限制——它是从"我"出发的。这意味着前两篇的全部成果仍然服务于自我。如果止步于此,你获得的是一个更精致的自我理解,而这个理解本身成为14DD(自我形象管理)的新材料:"我是一个做过深度内观的人。"

1.2 精神分析的陷阱

精神分析传统的根本困境在此。荣格的个体化是最接近的:整合了阴影以后,你变成了一个更完整的"我"。但"我"还是中心。个体化停在14DD——一个更丰富、更整合、更自洽的自我叙事。庄子看到了这个问题("吾丧我"),但他的解法是关掉观察者——第一篇已经分析了这个操作的自相矛盾性。问题不是关掉13DD,而是13DD的工作完成之后,下一步是什么。

1.3 本文的任务

13DD完成了对自身DD序列的理解之后,结构上的下一步不是更深的自我理解(那是原地打转),而是将同样的承认——每一层都有功能、都有痛、都有正、都有不可消除的余项——延伸到他者的DD序列。这个延伸就是15DD,就是"忘我"的精确定义,操作律令就是"己所不欲,勿施于人"。

二、14DD:自我形象管理——最精致的殖民

2.1 14DD的功能

14DD管理的是"我是什么样的人"。它把13DD的观察结果、12DD的逻辑推理、11DD的记忆、8DD的表达——所有层的信号——编织进一个连贯的自我叙事。14DD的正面形态是诚实的、经过审视的、承认余项的自我叙事——你知道自己是谁,也知道这个"知道"有盲区。

2.2 14DD的殖民形态:固的固

14DD的危险:它是对固化过程本身的固化。13DD已经是固——把5DD-12DD的信号固化为可观察的状态。14DD是固的固——把13DD的固化结果进一步固化为身份叙事并对这个叙事进行维护。当14DD工作过度时,它成为最精致的殖民形式——把所有层的信号都编入一个它需要的叙事。内观在14DD这里可以被完全收编:理解变成了更高级的自恋。

2.3 14DD是观与照的天花板

需要澄清:14DD不是问题,14DD自我封闭才是问题。健康的14DD——诚实的、经过审视的、承认余项的自我叙事——是15DD的必要前提(见预测四)。没有14DD的健康完成,试图直接跳到15DD只会产生道德式忘我或虚无式忘我。14DD的危险不在于它存在,而在于它宣称自己是终点。

前两篇的工作(观己 + 照己)能到达的最远处就是14DD。突破14DD不是更深的内观——更深的内观还是在14DD里打转。让14DD自己完成去中心化,就像让锤子把自己钉进去。突破14DD需要一个方向的转换:从向内看转向向外承认。

2.4 意义殖民:第三套殖民系统

第二篇揭示了两套殖民系统:医学殖民管负面卡住(穿白大褂),社会规范殖民管正面过载(穿道德制服)。本文揭示第三套:意义殖民——涌现层用why对定轮次的殖民(穿purpose的制服)。

三套殖民系统的完整地图:

第一套,医学殖民:13DD+对5DD-12DD负面卡住的病理化——穿白大褂的殖民。

第二套,社会规范殖民:13DD+对5DD-12DD正面过载的偏差化——穿道德制服的殖民。

第三套,意义殖民:13DD+用why对5DD-8DD定轮次方向的否定——穿purpose制服的殖民。

意义殖民是三套中最隐蔽的,因为它穿的制服最好看。被意义殖民你主动拥抱——"我有使命感""我找到了我的purpose"——你以为这个why是你的,但它可能是外部灌入的,而你的定轮次(5DD-8DD)正在被它压制。

区分意义殖民与意义涵育的标准是whether → how → why的顺序:如果why在定轮次之后自然生长,是涵育;如果why先于定轮次被安装并否定定轮次的信号,是殖民。同一个why,顺序不同,殖民和涵育就翻转了。判定灰区的补充判准:why是否可撤回,底层信号是否被允许推翻它,以及是否要求服从先于感知。

三、15DD:以他人为目的——忘我的结构定义

3.1 15DD的跃迁

15DD是从"我的DD序列是中心"到"他者的DD序列与我的同等真实、同等不可还原、同等是目的"的跃迁。这个跃迁不是道德命令,而是承认:他者也有5DD-12DD,他者的八痛八正与你的一样真实,他者的余项与你的余项同样不可消除。

3.2 Non dubito:15DD的操作态度

9DD non dubito vs. 15DD non dubito

9DD non dubito:你在世界中行动时不自我动摇。你选了,你不反复。这是主体与世界的关系。

15DD non dubito:你承认他者的DD序列与你的同等真实,不需要证据,不需要验证,不需要他者先"证明"自己值得被当作目的。这是主体与他者的关系。

没有9DD的non dubito,你在世界里站不住。没有15DD的non dubito,你站住了但只有你自己。而且9DD是15DD的前提:你对世界都non dubito了(9DD稳了),你才有可能对他者non dubito(15DD)。

Non dubito不是"相信"(12DD的construct,可以被证伪),不是"应该相信"(13DD的道德审查),不是"感觉到"(10DD的感知)。需要一道护栏:non dubito的对象是"他者也有一个与我同等真实、不可还原的DD序列",不是"他者所说的一切都应被采信"。Non dubito是15DD的操作态度,正如幽默是13DD的正面形态。

3.3 "忘"的精确定义

Forget the self是:忘掉自己作为唯一被承认有余项的那个特殊地位。当你把"有余项"这个承认从自己延伸到一切他者,"自己"就不再是中心——不是被消灭了,而是不再特殊了。这就是forget:不是遗忘,而是去中心化。

四、己所不欲勿施于人:15DD的操作律令

4.1 结构性重读

"己所不欲"的前提是你先完成了观己和照己——精确到层:我不欲我的5DD被否认(怕),我不欲被困死(困),我不欲我的新方向被堵(愤),我不欲我的表达被审查(堵),我不欲我的选择功能被动摇(疑),我不欲被无视我的痛,我不欲我的记忆被否定(苦),我不欲我的理解被碾压(惊)。"勿施于人"是15DD的操作定义:不对他者做你已经认出是殖民的事。

4.2 "己所不欲"的八层展开

DD己所不欲勿施于人
5DD我不欲我的怕被否认不否认他者的怕
6DD我不欲我被困死不把他者困死
7DD我不欲我的新方向被堵不堵他者的新方向
8DD我不欲我的表达被审查不审查他者的表达
9DD我不欲我的选择功能被动摇不动摇他者的选择功能
10DD我不欲被无视我的痛不无视他者的痛
11DD我不欲我的记忆被否定不否定他者的记忆
12DD我不欲我的理解被碾压不碾压他者的理解

4.3 从殖民诊断到伦理操作

第二篇建立了殖民系统的分析框架。本文把同样的框架从"系统对个体"和"涌现层对基础层"延伸到"个体对个体"。你对孩子说"你不应该害怕"——殖民5DD。你对伴侣说"你想太多了"——殖民12DD。你对朋友说"你应该振作起来"——殖民8DD。你对学生说"你应该有更大的目标"——意义殖民(用你的why否定他的定轮次方向)。这些操作在DD框架里都能被精确定位。

4.4 涵育作为15DD的正面操作

殖民的反面不是放任,而是涵育。15DD的正面操作是对他者DD序列的涵育:不审查他者的信号,为他者的八正创造条件。

涵育的结构定义:为他者的DD序列创造不被殖民的运作条件。不需要替他者解决5DD的怕,需要做的是不否认他的怕,让它自然转化为勇。不需要替他者提供why,需要做的是让他的定轮次先定,展轮次再展,why自然生长。

涵育既包含消极义务(我不殖民你)也包含积极义务(当第三方殖民你时我不沉默)。Non dubito他者有余项是持续运转的操作态度,当它遇到他者的余项正在被压制的现实时,它必须回应。不回应意味着non dubito停转了,而non dubito停转了就不是15DD了。

五、"忘"的三种错误形态

5.1 庄子式的忘:关掉观察者

第一篇已分析。用9DD选择"不选择",自相矛盾。"坐忘"的结构问题是13DD不能通过自己的操作关掉自己。你能做到的最多是13DD假装退场——但假装退场恰恰是14DD的一种高级自我叙事("我是一个已经超越了自我的人")。关掉观察者不是破,是另一种更隐蔽的固。

5.2 道德式的忘:压制自我

"无私奉献""牺牲自我""先人后己"——这些是13DD的审查命令,不是15DD的结构转向。压制自己的DD序列去服务他者,是涌现层对基础层的殖民——只是被殖民的对象从他者变成了自己。道德式的忘仍然预设了"自我"和"他者"之间的零和关系。15DD不是把中心从自己移到他者(那只是换了一个方向的殖民),而是取消"中心"本身。

5.3 虚无式的忘:什么都不重要

"一切都是空的""没有什么值得在意"——这不是15DD的超越,而是7DD愤伪装成的哲学立场。虚无式的忘把"自己不特殊"偷换成了"一切都不重要"。15DD说的是自己不特殊(每个DD序列都同等真实),不是一切都不重要(恰恰相反,每个DD序列都重要)。虚无是减法,15DD是乘法。

六、理论定位

6.1 孔子

"己所不欲,勿施于人"是15DD的操作律令的最精确的传统表述。孔子的贡献是把伦理锚定在"己所不欲"上——先从自己的体验出发,再推到他者。这个顺序与本系列三篇的顺序完全一致。孔子缺的是DD层的精度。本文提供了这个展开:八层的"己所不欲"对应八层的"勿施于人"。"仁"在DD框架下:15DD的正面形态——对他者DD序列的结构性涵育。

6.2 康德

三大批判在DD框架下的位置:第一批判是12DD的工作,第二批判是13DD的工作。第二批判的道德公式("永远把人当作目的,绝不仅仅当作手段")是15DD的经典哲学表述,Self-as-an-End框架的名字来源于此。但康德的路径是先验理性推导,不经过内观。SAE的路径:先在自己身上体验被当作手段(殖民)的感觉,理解了那个感觉的八层结构,然后从内部知道"不应该对他者做同样的事"。

康德在第三批判里给出了15DD到达方式的精确公式:非目的性的合目的性(Zweckmäßigkeit ohne Zweck)。15DD不是被设定的目的("我要成为一个以他人为目的的人"——那是14DD的自我叙事),而是当你把定轮次和展轮次都走通了之后,自然呈现的方向。"你应该以他人为目的"是第二批判的殖民命令。真正的15DD是第三批判的结构——非目的性的合目的性。

6.3 列维纳斯

他者的面孔(le visage d'autrui)作为不可还原的存在,构成伦理的起点。列维纳斯看到了15DD的核心:他者不是你的construct,他者具有不可消除的余项。列维纳斯缺的是向内的路径——他从他者出发,但没有说主体怎么到达能够"看到他者面孔"的位置。SAE的补充:你必须先完成对自己DD序列的观与照,才有能力在他者身上看到同样的结构。没有内观的人看到他者的面孔也会用13DD-14DD把它编码为自己叙事的一部分——"他很可怜"(13DD的审判)、"他和我一样"(14DD的同化)都不是15DD的non dubito。

6.4 佛教的慈悲

慈悲(karuṇā)在DD框架下不是情感,而是结构性地承认他者的苦与你的苦同构。"无缘大慈,同体大悲"精确地对应15DD的结构:无缘——不需要先建立12DD的关系construct才对他者施以涵育;同体——他者的DD序列与你的同构。佛教用疑破旧执,用惊崩旧模型,两者合力把主体从13DD-14DD的自我中心弹出去,到达15DD。禅宗说悟"不可说"的原因——12DD的东西都可以说,但15DD不可说(它不是新模型,它是对所有模型的non dubito态度)。

6.5 道元的完成

"参究佛道就是参究自己"——观己:启动对自身DD序列的内观。

"参究自己就是忘掉自己"——拆为照己 + 破己:先理解自身DD序列的八痛八正与殖民结构(照己),再将同样的承认延伸到他者(破己)。

"忘掉自己就是被万法所证成"——万法不是抽象的宇宙,是具体的他者的DD序列。你non dubito他者有余项,他者在你的不殖民中正常运作,他者的正常运作反过来确认你的15DD不是空想。这是证成,不是验证。

15DD用沉默回答"为什么"——不是虚无主义的那种空,而是结构性的让出:我的why位置让空了,他者的why才有空间存在。不持有why,本身就是非目的性的合目的性的最完整形态。

6.6 荣格的天花板

荣格的个体化到14DD为止。整合阴影、接纳阿尼玛/阿尼姆斯、趋近自性(Self)——全部是"我"的整合。荣格的Self不是15DD的以他人为目的,它是14DD的一个更完整的自我叙事。荣格看到了内在的他者(阴影、阿尼玛),但没有走到外在的他者。从荣格到15DD的跃迁:不仅整合自己内在的余项,而且承认他者的余项。他者的阴影不是你的素材,它是他者自己的,具有与你的阴影同等的真实性。

七、非平凡预测

前提说明:以下预测以评估工具的建立为前提条件。15DD作为伦理层面的操作,其测量难度高于5DD-12DD的情感状态——14DD可以伪装15DD,因此自我报告指标需要与行为指标和关系反馈指标交叉验证。以下预测是结构性研究假说,不构成伦理指导或心理干预建议。

预测一

15DD的建立(对他者DD序列的结构性承认与涵育)将降低涌现层的维护负荷。具体:14DD的自我叙事维护是高耗能操作;当15DD将"唯一目的"的地位从自我延伸到他者,14DD的维护压力减轻,涌现层释放的资源将导致中间层工作区间(5DD-12DD)功能的可测量改善。

否证条件:如果15DD操作的稳定建立与5DD-12DD功能改善之间没有显著相关,则否证。

预测二

15DD的人际涵育操作将改善他者的DD层功能。具体:在一个不殖民他者DD序列的关系环境中,他者的八正(勇安喜通 non dubito 宁甜笑)将出现可测量的改善,且改善的顺序符合八正的逐层支撑结构(低层先改善,高层后改善)。

否证条件:如果不殖民的关系环境与他者八正的改善之间没有显著相关,或改善的顺序与逐层支撑结构不一致,则否证。

预测三

"己所不欲勿施于人"的DD层精确化将提升人际冲突解决的效率。具体:当冲突双方能够识别各自正在对对方的哪一个DD层施加殖民操作时,冲突解决的速度和双方满意度将显著优于不使用DD层定位的冲突解决方式。

否证条件:如果DD层殖民定位在冲突解决中的效果与传统冲突解决方式没有显著差异,则否证。

预测四

15DD的稳定建立以14DD的健康完成为前提。具体:试图跳过14DD直接到达15DD的个体,将表现为道德式忘我(压制自我)或虚无式忘我(什么都不重要),而非真正的15DD。只有14DD健康完成(诚实的、承认余项的自我叙事已建立)的个体,才能稳定地运作15DD。

否证条件:如果14DD的完成程度与15DD的稳定性之间没有显著正相关,则否证。

八、结论

8.1 回收

本文论证:内观的终点不是自我理解(14DD),而是从自我理解中推出对他者DD序列的结构性承认与涵育(15DD)。"忘我"不是遗忘自己的存在,而是取消自己作为唯一目的的特殊地位。"己所不欲勿施于人"是15DD的操作律令:你已经从自己的DD序列内部体验了殖民的八层结构,你不对他者做同样的事。这个律令不是道德命令,而是非目的性的合目的性——走完观与照之后自然到达的位置。

8.2 贡献

  1. 定义14DD(自我形象管理)为内观的天花板——观与照能到达的最远处,也是最精致的殖民形式(固的固)。
  2. 揭示意义殖民作为第三套殖民系统——涌现层用why对定轮次方向的殖民,穿purpose的制服,三套殖民中最隐蔽的。
  3. 定义15DD为以他人为目的的结构性跃迁。给出"忘我"的精确定义:不是遗忘,而是去中心化。
  4. 将"己所不欲勿施于人"在DD框架下逐层精确化为八条具体操作指令,从抽象道德原则转化为可定位的殖民/涵育操作。
  5. 区分"忘"的三种错误形态与15DD的正面形态(non dubito他者也有余项)。
  6. 与孔子、康德(三大批判的DD映射)、列维纳斯、佛教慈悲、道元、荣格建立对话,完成道元四句的DD框架全读。

8.3 开放问题

第一,15DD到16DD的关系——15DD仍然是单向的。16DD的候选形态是mutual non dubito——我non dubito你有余项,你non dubito我有余项,同时发生。4DD是内观的下边界物自体(第一篇已建立),16DD是内观的上边界物自体。人的全部可操作区间是4DD-15DD。

第二,15DD的可操作化测量——需要行为观察(在他者DD序列受压时是否施以涵育而非殖民)和关系反馈(他者在这段关系中的八正是否改善)的交叉验证。

第三,15DD与制度设计的关系——如果殖民不只是个体行为也是制度行为,那么15DD是否可以被嵌入制度设计中?一个"不殖民"的制度是什么样的?

第四,"被万法所证成"的结构——证成是同时性的:你在做(non dubito),做本身就是证成。不是"如果你忘掉自己,那么你将被万法证成"(12DD的因果construct),而是"忘掉自己即是被万法证成"——同一件事的两个面。道元四句不是四步计划,而是一个同时发生的结构的四个面。

8.4 本系列的完成:从观到破

观 → 照 → 破。whether → how → why。看 → 懂 → 放。放的不是自己的存在,放的是自己作为唯一目的的地位。

第一篇(观己 / To Study the Self)建立内观的结构——你在看什么,观察者是谁,边界在哪里。

第二篇(照己 / To Understand the Self)建立内观的内容——每一层在做什么,怎么坏,怎么被三套殖民系统误判。

第三篇(破己 / To Forget the Self)建立内观的终点——看清了以后把同样的承认延伸到他者,取消自己的特殊地位,从自我理解到达对他者DD序列的结构性尊重。

关键参考

本文为Self-as-an-End理论框架的应用论文系列之一。基础框架见:Qin, H. (2025). "The Complete Self-as-an-End Framework" (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18727327);本系列第一篇见:Qin, H. (2025). "观己 / To Study the Self" (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18897147);第二篇见:Qin, H. (2025). "照己 / To Understand the Self" (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18934125)。

人,一种自己与自己的关系  ·  ← 第一篇:观己 / To Study the Self   |   第二篇:照己 / To Understand the Self   |   第三篇:破己 / To Forget the Self